Upper Endoscopy (EGD) infection lawsuit
    Back to Olympus Endoscope Lawsuit

    Upper Endoscopy (EGD) Infection Lawsuit

    Upper endoscopy (EGD) is among the most commonly performed endoscopic procedures. If you developed a serious infection after an EGD using an Olympus gastroscope, you may have legal options.

    Free, confidential case review
    No obligation
    May connect you with an independent law firm

    What is upper endoscopy (EGD)?

    Upper endoscopy, also called esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), uses a flexible gastroscope to examine the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum (first part of the small intestine). Gastroenterologists perform EGD to evaluate symptoms including heartburn, difficulty swallowing, unexplained nausea, upper abdominal pain, and upper GI bleeding.

    During EGD, the physician can take biopsies, remove polyps, dilate strictures, treat bleeding lesions, and place feeding tubes. The procedure is typically performed under sedation and takes 15-30 minutes. Over 7 million upper endoscopies are performed annually in the United States.

    The gastroscope used in EGD has multiple internal channels for suction, air/water delivery, and instrument passage. These channels must be thoroughly reprocessed between patients to prevent cross-contamination—a process that studies have shown is not always 100% effective.

    EGD contamination and infection risks

    Upper endoscopy patients are exposed to contamination risk through the gastroscope's internal channels. During the procedure, the device contacts mucosal surfaces of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum—picking up blood, tissue, gastric fluid, and bacteria. If the next patient's scope retains any of this material, infection transmission can occur.

    Studies have documented viable bacteria on reprocessed gastroscopes, including organisms associated with serious infections. The high volume of EGD procedures means that even a small contamination rate affects a large population of patients.

    EGD is often performed for relatively routine indications—heartburn evaluation, screening for Barrett's esophagus, dyspepsia workup. Patients reasonably expect that these low-risk procedures will not expose them to life-threatening infections from contaminated equipment.

    Injuries from EGD infections

    Patients who develop infections after upper endoscopy with a contaminated gastroscope may suffer:

    Esophageal and gastric infections following biopsy or therapeutic procedures

    Bacteremia from organisms introduced through the contaminated gastroscope

    H. pylori cross-contamination between patients

    Sepsis requiring hospitalization and intensive antibiotic treatment

    Perforation of the esophagus or stomach from device malfunction

    Mediastinitis from esophageal perforation with contamination

    Hepatitis or other pathogen transmission in cases of severe reprocessing failure

    Legal theories in EGD infection cases

    EGD infection lawsuits against Olympus pursue product liability claims including defective design (internal channels that resist adequate cleaning), failure to warn (insufficient guidance about contamination risks for routine upper GI procedures), and negligent post-market surveillance (inadequate response to reports of gastroscope-related infections).

    The routine nature of EGD and the reasonable patient expectation of safety strengthen these claims. Courts recognize that patients undergoing standard diagnostic procedures should not face preventable infection risks from contaminated medical devices.

    Evidence for EGD infection claims

    • EGD procedure report identifying the Olympus gastroscope model
    • Post-procedure cultures documenting the infecting organism
    • Hospitalization records for treatment of the post-EGD infection
    • Records of any pre-procedure health status to establish baseline
    • Follow-up gastroenterology records documenting ongoing care

    Primary sources

    When researching infection risk, reprocessing, or regulatory history, verify facts using official agency materials. Summaries on this site are for education and intake screening, not medical or legal advice.

    For overlapping questions about screening, timelines, and how Top Tier Legal connects inquiries with counsel, see the Olympus endoscope lawsuit FAQ on the main practice page rather than duplicating those answers on every procedure page.

    Frequently asked questions

    Free Case Review

    If your situation involves an Olympus endoscope upper endoscopy (egd) procedure and a qualifying injury, start your free, confidential case review below.

    Free & confidential

    Free Eligibility Check

    Answer a few quick questions to see if you may qualify. Takes under a minute — your information is sent for a free, confidential review.

    Step 1 of 4

    Top Tier Legal, LLC is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Submitting information does not create an attorney-client relationship. If you qualify, we may connect you with an independent law firm.